Thursday, November 8, 2012

Film Review: Mansfield Park (1999 film) by Joshua McNeeley


 Mansfield Park (Miramax Film 1999): Directed by Patricia Rozema; Starring Frances O’Conner, James Purevoy, etc.

Mansfield Park begins with Fanny Price leaving her family to live with her rich relatives. In spite of being brought up in a rich household, she is not considered equal to the rest of the family. Fanny grows up with her cousins Tom (the rebellious older cousin), Edmund (the kind, brother like figure who needs Fanny to put words to his feelings), and Maria and Julia (the two sisters who are frivolous and desiring of attention, Maria more so than Julia). Fanny is thrust into situations where she has to make a decision between her sense and her sensibility, from an offer of marriage by Mr. Henry Crawford (which she refuses due to the fact that she does not trust him for she sees his true character) to being sent away from Mansfield Park (because she refuses Mr. Crawford) to bashing heads with Miss Crawford (due to a family scandal). Mansfield Park also explores the idea of whether or not two friends can be together. According to this film, it can happen for Fanny and Edmund do get married at the end. Interestingly enough, the plot itself didn’t come off like a Jane Austen story, but the characters do seem to be true to the Austen character types from her novels.
 Now, I have never read Mansfield Park, but this film did contain elements which I felt were successful, as well as unsuccessful. One of these successes was the characters. Each characters personality could be found in another novel of Austen’s, an example of this is Mr. Henry Crawford (who is comparable to Mr. Wickham from Pride and Prejudice). Mr. Crawford is a person who, as Fanny Price claims to Sir Thomas, “His sole interest is in being loved, sir, not in loving.” At one point his interest is in Maria, who is engaged to be married to another, and for almost no apparent reason, other than physical appearance, he switches his interests to Fanny Price. Later he goes and sleeps with Maria, after she is married to another, because she shows him the attention he desires. This is arguably like Mr. Wickham who desires to have the admiration of all, and when someone sees through his act, like Elizabeth, he begins to avoid contact with that person. From the plain silly behavior of Mr. Rushworth to the cruel action of Mrs. Norris, these characters really do stay consistent with other Character types from Austen’s works. Furthermore, the actors and actresses who play the roles really seem to become an Austen character.
I must confess that there are times when these characters do things that are not totally congruent with something Austen would do. However, this is due to the plot of the story, not with how the characters actually act. This is where the film becomes unsuccessful in capturing the essence of Austen. Mansfield Park does seem to focus mainly on the romance, rather than class differences or women’s education, even though it does offer some interpretations on this. One element in this film that really separates itself from an Austen work is the films knack of wanting to tell an Austen story and deal with racism in England. As I said earlier, I have never read Mansfield Park, but as a developing Austen fan, this racism element feels like a slap in the face. At one point Fanny finds sketches of people being raped, beaten, and Sir Thomas being pedophile. This was a most unsuccessful, and disappointing, element and almost ruins the Austen film experience.
In spite of all this, the film does offer some interesting readings of women’s education, and class relations.  For example, at the beginning of the film she overhears Sir Tomas telling his daughters that she is not their equal, but she must never know it. This shows that the family will do the proper thing, the socially acceptable thing, and act like Fanny is their equal, which doesn’t really happen, but they will never believe this to be true. Another thought-provoking interpretation was on women’s education, which really fit the Austen mold. The film shows that in spite of a formal education, women who are raised in wealth really are not educated in the modern sense of the word. Fanny who has no money following her, increases her intellect because that’s all she has, but the other two female cousins are very frivolous and selfish. Notice that towards the end of the movie Maria and Mr. Crawford have an affair and the Sir Thomas complains that in spite of all that education she received she still did this. This tells us that even though Maria received a formal education, she was never taught to think and reason for herself. This idea seems to be very consistent with some of the other Austen works, such as Pride and Prejudice (Elizabeth almost has to increase her intellect and Miss Bingley really doesn’t because she has money) and Emma (Emma doesn’t reach for her full potential because she doesn’t have to, whereas Jane Fairfax does reach for education because she doesn’t have money).
Mansfield Park does have some great qualities, mainly the characters, but at the same time the unsuccessful traits of this film does overshadow what can be deemed as successful, in my opinion. Even though the film does capture the essence of an Austen character, this does not make up for the racism element, the lack of satirical elements, and the heavily romantic plot it tries to bring to the table.

3 comments:

  1. ["Fanny is thrust into situations where she has to make a decision between her sense and her sensibility, from an offer of marriage by Mr. Henry Crawford (which she refuses due to the fact that she does not trust him for she sees his true character)"]


    Fanny's real reason for refusing Henry Crawford was that she was in love with her cousin, Edmund Bertram. She only used Henry's moral compass as an excuse to reject her.

    ReplyDelete
  2. ["At one point his interest is in Maria, who is engaged to be married to another, and for almost no apparent reason, other than physical appearance, he switches his interests to Fanny Price. Later he goes and sleeps with Maria, after she is married to another, because she shows him the attention he desires."]


    I think you need to read the novel. Rozema's movie failed to point out that originally, Henry had intended to flirt with Fanny in order to make her fall in love with him. Instead, he ended up following in love with her and was sincere in his pursuit of her. But after her rejection, he went to London, reunited with Maria Bertram Rushworth and ran off with her.

    Henry Crawford, for all of his faults, was a little more complicated and ambiguous than George Wickham. The movie failed to portray the details that led to Henry's marriage proposal.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for the comments...these reviews were written by my students as a requirement for the class, and in some cases ,they hadn't read the original novels (we only read half of Austen's works for the class itself). In the case of MP, I told them to judge the movie as stand-alone work and relate it to the novels we had read in class: Sense and Sensibility, Emma, Persuasion, and some of Austen's early, unpublished work (Catherine, etc). I would pass your comments onto this student, but he's long gone now, I'm afraid. Feel free to read more of the blog if it interests you, though I no longer post on it since the class ended in 2012.

    ReplyDelete