Persuasion. Dir. Adrian Shergold. Perf. Sally
Hawkins, Alice Krige, Rupert Penry-Jones, Anthony Head, Amanda Hale. ITV/BBC Television, 2007. 2 out of 4 stars.
I must
admit that I was very skeptical about liking the character of Anne Elliot on
film as well as I liked her in the book. It would seem to be a very hard task
to make her deep thoughts and feelings known to the audience without the
benefit of the play-by-play of what she is thinking and feeling that we get
from Jane Austen’s detailed writing. But I was pleasantly surprised by Sally
Hawkins’s strong and sympathetic performance, which was the best feature of the
film. It is too bad that the rest of the film was not quite as good. Some
scenes were played up for comedy, or were made entirely too dramatic, when they
should have been more natural. In this adaptation the grand gestures sometimes
drown out what can be breathtaking in the subtleness that Austen creates in her
writing.
Although
the rest of the cast does a fair job it was very disappointing how many scenes were
cut short, and many of the best parts of the book were not shown at all. When
Anne has the conversation that she was supposed to have with Captain Harville
at the end, about which sex loves longest, with Captain Benwick at Lyme
instead, all my hopes of seeing the scene that had me holding my breath while
Captain Wentworth dropped his pen were dashed. It was also cut very short and
did not seem to matter as much in this film as it should have. Although her
marriage is seen as happy and ideal, Mrs. Croft’s stories of her own experience
as a sailor’s wife were overlooked. The scenes with Mrs. Smith were cut short
as well without giving her whole story with Mr. Elliot, and it is only very quickly
mentioned at the end that he had bad intentions in wanting to marry Anne. The
issues that were most interesting in the story were ignored in the film in favor
of getting to the action of moving Anne and Captain Wentworth closer together,
which turned out to climax in the slowest and most awkward kiss I’ve seen
outside of a comedy.
All in
all, this version was not terrible to watch but very disappointing if you’ve
read the book and were expecting to see the most intriguing parts played out. The
1995 version is a much more thoughtful piece which was more careful to include the
deeper issues of gender and class behind the love story that Austen intended
her readers to see. Austen portrayed everyday people going about their daily
lives in her writing. She did not intend to write the love story of the century
in any of her novels. She wrote not merely about strong feelings, but true
feelings being worked out through social customs and restrictions. The awkward
use in the film of enormous crashing waves at Lyme, some overdone characters, a
passionate fit of jealousy, and an ending that has the heroine running around
frantically and out of breathe for the sake of drama and action does not compliment
the subtle and complex way that Jane Austen tells an enchanting story.
No comments:
Post a Comment